A selection evidence checklist for the internally JST-associated XADS-08V-K record. Preserve its complete identity while requesting exact manufacturer documentation. A publicly accessible XAD family catalogue is contextual reading; it does not establish the missing exact-part relationship or approve technical values for XADS-08V-K.
1. Confirm the internal record
The internal catalogue lists XADS-08V-K as record 201985, available through the XADS-08V-K product page. Its stored brand association is JST. The reviewed JST XAD catalogue does not establish this exact orderable number, so retain that identity gap explicitly rather than rewriting XADS as XADRP or another nearby model.
Do not decode the name into positions, pitch, ratings, mounting, materials or mating relationships without an applicable exact-part source. A shared prefix is a discovery lead, not technical evidence. Keep manufacturer identity, internal description and unresolved source mapping as separate fields until a controlled document reconciles them.
2. Make evidence status visible
Connector selection combines interface geometry, circuit requirements, assembly and supply conditions. Starting from a model string, a search excerpt or an informal statement can leave those decisions unsupported. Use a register that records the source, document scope, revision and the exact requirement each item supports, rather than collecting links without explaining their relevance.
Distinguish confirmed, pending and not applicable. Give unresolved fields an owner and next action. Do not copy another model value into an empty cell or treat a related-family catalogue as part-specific acceptance evidence. A deliberate unknown is easier to review than an apparently precise figure with no traceable origin.
3. Engineering selection checklist
Mechanical interfaces
Request the exact drawing for dimensions, mounting, keying, retention and the intended interface. Record the complete proposed mate, contact and accessory identities separately. Compare both sides using applicable documents; a matching family name or a successful trial fit does not establish interchangeability. Retain the project reviewer and scope of any decision.
Electrical requirements
Define the project circuit, load and required insulation evidence before assigning limits. No electrical value for XADS-08V-K is confirmed by this article. Leave current, voltage, resistance and derating questions pending until the source explicitly covers the exact configuration and the responsible project process reviews its applicability.
Environment and reliability
Identify temperature, humidity, vibration, dust, liquid and other intended exposure conditions as requirements to investigate. Obtain applicable manufacturer or project evidence before entering protection levels, temperature limits, life or test conclusions. Do not infer sealing or durability from appearance, a housing colour or a generic connector description.
Compliance
Check declarations against the exact part, revision and applicable market. The current evidence does not confirm certifications for XADS-08V-K. Keep a family-level statement as contextual information unless its scope demonstrably covers the intended item; neither a stored brand nor a distributor category supplies that missing confirmation.
4. Purchasing and supply-chain handoff
Use XADS-08V-K in full and ask the supplier to identify the exact document, revision and covered orderable item. Mark family documents and indistinct images as discovery material. Keep discrepancies visible rather than silently renaming the target to the closest published part; the distinction matters before procurement and engineering approve a configuration.
Confirm commercial quantity, packaging, price and lead time in a current formal reply. Preserve enquiry date, quotation validity and delivery scope. None is promised here. Keep commercial availability separate from technical suitability, because a source that offers an item does not necessarily provide the required drawing or project evidence.
For ERP or PLM handoff, retain the full model, internal record, product link, evidence source, revision, actual review date, responsible owner and status. A missing technical field should remain pending. Reconcile later updates with the original decision register so the reason for each change remains recoverable.
5. A controlled review sequence
- Freeze identity: use XADS-08V-K and record 201985 as the target, retaining nearby model numbers as separate discovery leads.
- Collect documents: request the exact datasheet, dimensional drawing, assembly instruction and required declarations, with source and revision.
- Compare individually: reconcile mechanical, circuit, environment, compliance and supply requirements. Keep unsupported fields pending.
- Review differences: pause the affected release when identity, revision or description conflicts, then obtain a traceable clarification.
- Record the outcome: retain the actual responsible decision, reviewed evidence and project scope before changing the material status.
- Maintain the register: review later revisions and configuration changes without erasing the original source or decision context.
6. Conclusion
The evidence supports an internal XADS-08V-K record and its stored JST association. A verified public exact-part manufacturer source remains missing. The XAD family catalogue can help frame a document request, but cannot supply a specification, mating approval or substitute relationship for the different target string.
The next useful step is an exact-part evidence request, followed by requirement comparisons and a recorded project decision. Preserve the original model throughout that process. Resolving source identity before debating suitability prevents unsupported technical details from spreading into enquiries, BOMs and production instructions.
Related navigation
- JST brand catalogue
- headers and wire housings category
- request exact-part evidence from Lianxinlian Electronics
The exact XADS-08V-K source, internal series and application mappings remain unverified. XAD catalogue values are not assigned to this part.
Manufacturer source
Author: Lianxinlian Electronics Product Information Team. Technical data quality review: Lianxinlian Electronics Technical Data Quality Team performs automated source, language and internal-link completeness checks. This does not constitute human engineering approval or approval of product suitability.